Private school parents deserve tax breaks. Aside from paying local property taxes, Americans also pay an additional school tax that is used only in the public schools’ education system. The government should offer parents of children attending private schools tax breaks or reimbursement vouchers since they do not use the district’s public schools. Many people feel that since private school parents make this decision on their own they shouldn’t be given any tax breaks; however, not all private school parents are rich and they too may still struggle to pay off the bills at the end of the month.
In 2008, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal initiated a debate about tax breaks for private school tuition. He presented a plan to the Legislature, where 50 percent of the private school tuition, up to $5,000, would be deducted from the families state income tax. This could save $60 to $300 per child in taxes for the family. Some fear that “this legislation may subsidize private schools at the expense of public school children,” however, if the government would give tuition vouchers it would open up more opportunities for low-income families to send their children to private schools.
Private school tax breaks are not only beneficial for parents who want to send their children to a parochial school, where their children will get a dual curriculum, learning both religious and general studies, but also for parents of differently abled children. Many parents, even though they may be financially struggling, need to put a child in a private institute for more personalized attention due to learning or social disabilities. It has been proven that children with ADD/ADHA, dyslexia, and other learning disabilities succeed more in private schools with trained teachers and the proper accommodations for their specific learning situations. Tax breaks can help more parents afford these private schools for their differently abled children.
The US government should pay more attention to school taxes and the strains it is putting on many families who are not even benefiting from them. Even though it’s a couple’s own decision to send their child to a private institution, some of their tax money should be returned or at least used towards their own child's education. As it remains now, private school parents are paying for two education bills yearly. One for their own child’s private school tuition and another for someone else’s child’s public school.
Since many will argue that rich people do not deserve tax breaks one solution is to create a system where the government makes an evaluation of each families income and distributes school vouchers accordingly. This income cap will give tax breaks to families who can not afford private schools but still want their children to attend one.
In 2004, Congress endorsed the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, a school-voucher program, in Washington, giving 1,700 students up to $7,500 in a voucher to help low-income families send their children to the school of their choice. This program has helped many children succeed and has given hope to brighter futures for children with learning disabilities.
However in 2009, President Barack Obama’s administration completely shut the program down. So on May 6th, 2009 parents and students assembled in Washington, D.C.'s Freedom Plaza to rally for their cause.
Mercedes Campbell, one of the students affected by the congressional Democrats backdoor legislature move to shut down the voucher system, voiced her support for the program at the rally and various other events. She was given the opportunity to attend a private school because of the voucher program but her younger sister and brother wont be able to have that choice. On Fox news, reporter Brit Hume said about Obama that by ending the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program “he would be signing a bill that would strip two poor kids of the educational opportunity his own children are enjoying.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Joanna Zyznowski
ReplyDelete1A) This is essay will be about low-income private school parents deserving tax breaks or some type of school voucher.
1B) The writer believes that these private school parents should receive tax breaks.
1C) The introduction doesn't hook my attention as much as it is supposed to because when she writes that "...not all private school parents are rich and they too may still struggle to pay off the bills...", I automatically think of a problem solver, which is for those parents to send their children to public schools instead.
1D) The introduction could be a lot stronger. The writer starts off strongly with the first sentence being the purpose of the whole essay, but doesn't introduce the main points of her essay. Also, the last sentence of the introduction may throw many readers off, because they can immediately think of public school being the alternative to the problem, instead of parents of private school children receiving tax breaks.
2)
-Not all private school parents are rich.
-"If the government would give tuition vouchers it would open up more opportunities for low-income families."
-beneficial to parents who have children that have specific needs and need more attention.
3)
-It is a family's own decision to send their child to a private school, when instead they could send their child to a public school without the heavy tuition bill.
-The rich do not deserve tax breaks.
4A) When she mentions that people would argue that a private school family can forget about suffering financially and send their child to a public school, the writer makes a good point and deals with the opposition well stating that there are many children with different learning disabilities (for example) that require a lot more attention. They would receive this extra attention during school hours only in a private school.
4B) The writer's strongest point in the essay is when she defends her idea of tax breaks for private school parents by mentioning the many kids who have learning disabilities, which can attract readers to her side of the argument.
4C) The writer's weakest point is her introduction, which is essentially the most important piece of the essay. The way she writes it allows the reader to easily turn against her argument by easily finding a solution to the problem, which would be to send all kids to a public school. She should rewrite the introduction in a way where it will grasp attention and keep everyone on her side of the argument.
4D) Besides fixing the problem in her introduction that I just previously mentioned, the writing is organized well.
4E) Many parents want their children to be more active in the classroom, which is easier to accomplish if the class size is a lot smaller in a private school compared to a public school.
4F) There are programs in public schools where children who are differently abled receive special, or extra attention.
5) I believe the thesis is great. It's simple and direct.
6)
"On Fox news, reporter Brit Hume said about Obama that by ending the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program..."
-On Fox News, reporter Brit Hume spoke about Obama stating that by ending the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, ...
"It has been proven that children with ADD/ADHA, dyslexia, and other learning disabilities..."
-It has been proven that children with ADD/ADHD*, dyslexia, and other learning disabilities...
7) There should be more statistical data included.
i thought this was very informative and all of your information really provided a clear understanding of the topic that you had conveyed.
ReplyDelete